Friday, July 27, 2012

Top 4 Things to Watch Out for When Hiring an Elmhurst DUI Lawyer: Number 1 - The Former Prosecutor Claim

Elmhurst is ranked second among DuPage County municipalities for DUI arrests.  If you've been arrested by the City of Elmhurst and charged with DUI finding the right Elmhurst DUI defense lawyer is a critical step to achieving the best possible result in your case and putting the entire incident behind you.

DUI defense law is a complicated area of the law.  Unlike general criminal defense the most effective DUI defense practitioners must be extremely knowledgeable about the arcane science of breath and blood alcohol testing along with myriad other facets of this complex legal arena.

Unfortunately, the Illinois Supreme Court does not recognize a specialization in DUI defense.  Therefore, anyone with an Illinois law license is able to represent DUI defendants.  DUI defense practice is difficult to do well and very easy to do badly.  With more than 40,000 Illinois DUI cases per year, many lawyers who have difficulty making ends meet and have scant experience doing criminal defense work much less, DUI defense work, "branch out" to increase income and take on cases in the DUI defense field.

Beware of the "Former Prosecutor" Claim

Every year a number of prosecutors are fired, forced out,, or resign  from
the State's Attorney's Office, only to quickly pivot and make the claim of being highly ranked
DUI defense lawyers.  They are easy to find because they invariably tout their
experience as "former prosecutors" every chance they get.  This is a tried and
true marketing gimmick used by many lawyers who lack true Elmhurst DUI Defense experience
and talent in order to sign up unsuspecting DUI clients.  The reason this ploy is so prevelant
is because of what is suggested by it - usually implicitly and sometimes explicitly - that
the lawyer's status as an ex-prosecutor will help their clients "get the best deal."
This is not to say that all ex-prosecutors are incapable of doing solid legal
work.  Indeed, there are many former prosecutors who become good overall lawyers and
some who become decent defense lawyers.  The trap to avoid is to put too much
stock into the notion that experience as a prosecutor translates into expertise in
the much different arena of dedicated DUI defense practice.  If you remain aware of
the logical fallacies inherent in "Former Prosecutor" trap you can make a much more
informed decision about which lawyer you want to entrust your DUI defense to.

Former Prosecutor Fallacy No. 1
"I can get you the best deal because I have connections"

 

This logic fallacy is by far the one most frequently employed in order to sign up
unsuspecting clients.  A closer look at the logic behind such an assumption
demonstrates just how dangerous it can be to your receiving the best possible
DUI defense.  If a lawyer makes a claim to "know the right people" in
order to negotiate a "great deal" for you he needs you to believe that he works
out "great deals" with the current prosecutor frequently for many different clients.
But if the lawyer does work with the current prosecutor this much, wouldn't you think
there would be a limit to the "favors" the current prosecutor would do for his old buddy the
former prosecutor?  Of course there is.  No State's Attorney is going to risk
his job or law license to repeatedly do "an old friend" any favors.  The key
to spotting this type of lawyer is too pay close attention to how much he
talks about his prior experience as a prosecutor, how well he knows the current
prosecutor and how little he lets you tell him all the facts connected with
your arrest.  Despite what the lawyer may imply, the best negotiated settlements
with prosecutors come when the Defense lawyer negotiates from a position of
strength.  Negotiating strength comes ONLY through careful creative preparation of a defense
case based on the facts and law.  If you believe the best results come from having
a lawyer who claims or implies he "has connections" you are setting yourself up
to make the bad situation of a DUI much worse and much more costly.


Former Prosecutor Fallacy No. 2
"My trial experience as a prosecutor translates to defense expertise"
 


The lawyer who makes this claim wants to have his cake and eat it too.
On the one hand he wants you to believe that he was a great prosecution
trial lawyer who won most, if not all of his cases as a prosecutor.
At the same time and on the other hand, he needs you to believe his experience
prosecuting cases gave him an opportuniy to learn winning defense techniques
and tricks that he'll use for you.  Of course both cannot be true.  If this
lawyer was so good at being a prosecutor there were few if any defense lawyers
who ever got the best of him.  So if he always beat the other lawyer how was
he able to learn those defense techniques?  None of them must have worked
so what were the winning techniques that this former prosecutor learned?

It is easy to see how quickly the illusion of prosecution experience being a
bonus unravels with some critical thought.  Unfortuanately, many people who
have been just charged with a DUI are so drained emotionally that they let their
guard down and hear what the want to hear and believe what they want to believe.
When shopping for the best DUI defense attorney always keep in mind that
all lawyers are not created equal and that some will say just about anything in
order to collect a fee.

The Skill Set of Successful Defense Law is Different than the Skill Set for Prosecutors 


When evaluating the relative worth of a lawyer's claimed experience as a former prosecutor it is
helpful to compare Professional DUI Defense Law with Professional football.  Like lawyers, pro
Football players are both highly trained and have natural talents.  It is the combination of the
two that separate the pros from the amateurs.  You don't have to know a lot about Pro Football
to understand that different positions on a team require an entirely different set of natural talents
and abilities.  In Pro Football, a great running back has an entirely different set of talents than a
great defensive tackle and vice versa.  Each could of course learn and understand the techniques
of the other position but the innate talent it takes to play either position at a professional level cannot
simply be learned.  Either you have that innate skill set or you don't. 

The same can be said of lawyers.  The mindset and talents it takes to make a professional prosecutor
are different than the mindset and talents it takes to be a professional defense lawyer.  Going from
being a prosecutor to being a defense lawyer is NOT like a pro football player being traded from one team
team to another.  Rather, the switch from prosecution to defense law is more like a natural running back
trying to switch positions and play at defensive tackle.  The God-given talent it takes
to be great at one position is rarely bestowed on anyone to be great at another position.

The most important natural talent that great defense lawyers have over great prosecutors is a creative
mindset.  The ability to think outside the box to craft defense strategies is seldom in the wheelhouse
of lawyers who spent years as prosecutors.  So when hiring a lawyer for an Elmhurst DUI, be aware that prosecution experience does not necessarily translate into defense expertise.